During my undergraduate studies I took a bunch of courses in Philosophy. One of my recreations was “Reductio ad absurdum”, where you basically take the writings of some of the great philosophers and manage to arrive at contradictory and/or absurd conclusions. Last week I had a very interesting conversation that reminded me of my past hobby, and I admit in advance that I am over simplifying …;
1. The regulation penalizes Service Providers for having too many incorrect charging/un-billed CDRs etc.
2. RA’s job (among others) involves discovering leakages, including incorrect charging /un-billed CDRs etc.
3. Discovering leakages, in many cases results in the recovery of leakages
4. Discovering Leakages, in many cases results in finding the root of problems and avoiding the same problem from reoccurring
5. For Service Providers to improve their profitability and future compliance to regulatory requirements they have to find and prevent the reoccurrence of leakages. But this exposes the fines themselves. However by not looking seriously for leakages, the Service Provider loses money, but is compliant. In some cases the same person is in charge of the Regulatory compliance and Revenue Assurance. Go figure.